The 2013 defensive honors for the San Diego Chargers

2
77
Weddle fired up during the AFC Wild-Card game vs the Bengals

The 2013-14 season for the San Diego Chargers was one that was filled with surpassed expectations.  Not many expected the Chargers to make a playoff run, and even though their season ended on Sunday evening at the hands of the division rival Denver Broncos, this was still a season to look back on with great pleasure. With that said, let’s honor the best that the Chargers had to offer during the 2013-14 NFL season.

Last week, we took a look at the offense. This week, we take a look at defense.

Defensive MVP – Eric Weddle

Although Earl Thomas might be the leader of the pack when it comes to safeties in the National Football League, some might say that Eric Weddle is not too far behind him. However, he was not nearly as dominant as he was in 2012, Weddle still managed to put together a very good 2013 campaign and was far and away the best player on the Chargers defense. Ranked as the No. 7 safety in the NFL per Pro Football Focus, Weddle came away with 115 tackles, two interceptions, and ten passes defended. His decreased numbers were mainly due to having to help mask the holes in a subpar secondary, but with some added pieces this offseason, Weddle will return even stronger.

Defensive Rookie of the Year – Manti Te’o

This was won by default. The fact is that Te’o was one of the only defensive rookies to see the field and make an impact as well. Steve Williams never saw a snap, as the cornerback from California was put on injured reserve before the season began. Tourek Williams, from Florida International, was a bit of a pleasant surprise, but has some work to put in during the offseason. Williams and Te’o add depth to a front seven that got a lot better over the course of the season.

Breakout Player – Marcus Gilchrist

A strong safety from Clemson, Marcus Gilchrist had a season worthy of “break out” honors. Drafted as the 50th overall pick in the 2nd round of the 2011 NFL Draft, Gilchrist really came into his own in his third year in the league. While he did allow three touchdowns, Gilchrist played very well against the run, and came away with two interceptions and five passes defended on the season. 2013 was Gilchrist’s first season at safety, and much like Weddle, his play will improve with better play from the corners in 2014. Shareece Wright finished 2013 strong, but the Chargers will need to add a cover guy who can make an immediate impact heading into next season.

  • Al_

    I say Addae should get defensive rookie of the year as a non-drafted free agent. Brought a physicality to the team and made some great plays

  • [Important Note on July 30, 2012]My original reveiw was about the Energizer ‘2500mAh’ batteries back in 2006. Energizer introduced the new ‘2300mAh’ series in 2010. I have now updated my reveiw to reflect my opinion on the new series.I had very bad experiences with the previous generation of Energizer 2500mAh rechargeable NiMH batteries, circa 2005. They suffer from rapid self-discharge problem (that is, can’t hold a charge for more than a few days even while not in use), and have very limited lifespan (capacity deteriorated badly after just a few dozen cycles). Energizer’s initial response was to change the existing series’ capacity rating to ‘2450mAh’, as if mere name change is going to solve anything. Around mid-2010, Energizer finally started to introduce a new series to address this problem. The series is named Recharge’ and it claims to Hold charge up to one year .The featured on this page is the new Recharge’ series, with a rated capacity of 2300mAh for AA cells. I have tested a set of those new batteries, using my charger/analyzer. Here are my findings:- Right out of the package, the average remaining capacity is 1684mAh, or 73% of the rate capacity.- After the first Charge/Discharge cycle, the average capacity jumped to 2314mAh- After three more Charge/Discharge cycles, the capacity improved slightly to 2362mAh- After storing the batteries on the shelf for 3.5 months (108 days), the remaining charge is 88% of original capacity.The above showed that those Energizer 2300mAh cells are indeed low-self-discharge type, similar to the better known .I have just one remaining doubt: Energizer seems evasive about the battery lifespan, saying only Charge 100 s of times and Charge up to 250 more times (than Energizer 2450mAh) . In contrast, Sanyo proudly advertises ‘1500 cycles’ for the eneloop.On the other hand, the Energizer cell’s measured capacity is about 12% higher than that of the eneloop (rated 2000mAh, measured 2100mAh), so even if it can only last for 500 cycles, it is still worthwhile to give it a try. Just make sure that what you get is the new 2300mAh series, not the old 2500/2450mAh junk series.==========Old reveiw titled Shockingly high self-discharge rate! follows:==========All rechargeable battery manufacturers love to boast about their product’s current capacity (mAh). But there is a dirty little secret that they don’t want you to hear: self-discharge rate. Simply put: a fully charged NiCd or NiMH cell will gradually lose its stored energy over time. Technical papers I have researched typically put the self-discharge rate at 10-20% per month for NiCd cells, and 20-30% per month for NiMH cells. This kind of self-discharge rate is usually acceptable in applications such as digital cameras.I bought 8 of those Energizer 2500mAh rechargeable NiMH batteries over one year ago. At first, I was very happy about the large current capacity offered by those batteries. But within a few months, I started to notice that they die very quickly in my digital camera. In fact, a set of Sony 2300mAh NiMH batteries I bought one year earlier seems to last much longer when used in the same camera.I recently did some controlled experiments (using the LaCrosse BC-900 AlphaPower Battery Charger) and found out what’s wrong: The Energizer NiMH batteries have very high self-discharge rate. After fully charging all 8 cells and left them on the shelf for one week, five of them lost over 30% of their charge, and the other three lost about 20%. In comparison, the set of older Sony batteries only lost around 10% over the same one-week period.So what this really means is: if I charge up those Energizer 2500mAh batteries and leave them in my camera for three weeks, they will become totally exhausted. I found this kind of self-discharge rate completely unacceptable, therefore I strongly advise against buying those batteries.[Update on April 9, 2007]I have hardly used those Energizer 2500mAh cells in the last few month. Now they have deteriorated even further. Five of them can’t even hold their charges for more then a day.Instead of the Energizer 2500mAh cells, I recommend buying the Rayovac Hybrid 2100mAh cells. They have very low self-discharge rate (see my reveiw on RAYO 4PK AA ) and are cheaper than the better-known