Is Mike Glennon really the answer for the Bears?

Aug 20, 2016; Jacksonville, FL, USA; Tampa Bay Buccaneers quarterback Mike Glennon (8) drops to throw a pass during the third quarter of a football game against the Jacksonville Jaguars at EverBank Field. Mandatory Credit: Reinhold Matay-USA TODAY Sports

Chicago Bears fans are a difficult bunch to please. I’ve discovered this firsthand; some of you guys can be a tough crowd – especially on Yahoo! Sports. They rarely agree on anything that their favorite team may do. However, it appears that they are all on board with one thing: Mike Glennon should not be their franchise quarterback.

And they’re completely justified in believing so. Everything about the rumored signing just screams the opposite of what Ryan Pace has done as general manager of the Bears.

Pace has the tendency to sign young, talented free agents that come at a cheap price. Glennon, 27, certainly fits that first criterion. His talent nowhere near matches up to the potential deal he might get this offseason, though.


Daily Dime: Mariota’s recovery, Eagles listening for offers, Cooks’ value

This Week in NFL History: Moments that changed the landscape of the NFL from March 5h to March 11th

cover32 Exclusive: Interview with NFL prospect, St. Francis safety, Lorenzo Jerome.

Sure, the talent is there – he was solid in his rookie year – but why would the Bears (or any team, for that matter) pay $15 million per year for a quarterback who hasn’t started in a game since 2014? Just two years after drafting Glennon with a third-round pick, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers drafted Jameis Winston. That should speak volumes about what they think about the NC State alum.

The Bears also have a lot of other needs that they need to fill. Cornerback, safety, tight end, offensive tackle and wide receiver are all still big holes on their roster. Signing Glennon would make it tougher for them to fill those needs.

This situation is very similar to that of Brock Osweiler’s situation last offseason. Osweiler only started seven games in a span of four years with the Denver Broncos. The Houston Texans, a team longing for an answer at quarterback, gave up everything but the kitchen sink to sign him in free agency. A year later, they have just as many quarterback issues as they did last year.

I’m a firm believer that, unless a proven starter becomes available through trade, a team should always use the draft to find a long-term solution at quarterback. It’s cheap, it’s effective, and it works more often than signing one in free agency.

Chicago should strongly reconsider signing Glennon if they’ve decided on doing so. It’s too big of a risk for a team as bad as they are to make.

– Jacob Infante is a National Editor for cover32 and also covers the Chicago Bears. What do you think the Bears should do to fix their quarterback problems? Tell him on Twitter @jacobinfante24.

Previous article2017 Chicago Bears mock offseason
Next articleINTERVIEW: Path 2 the Pros: #1 RB T.J. Logan values team
  • Jeremy Alexander

    This article is ridiculous. They had to part ways with Cutler and it would be moronic to give up major draft picks for Garropolo after the fast one the Pat’s pulled with Matt Cassell a few years ago. There are no qb’s worth the 3rd pick in the draft, but there are franchise defining defensive players that make much more sense for a rebuilding team. Romo isn’t coming to Chicago to play for a 3-13 team with his time in the NFL coming to an end, so Glennon was the best option. Not only that, but they can part ways with him after the season if the situation calls for it, and because Pace didn’t spend like an idiot for average players, they will have money to pursue better options in the next couple years and a couple more drafts with a better qb class. Poor analysis, my man.